To: Uniform Law Commissioners
From: Ralph Nader
Date: July 18, 1997
Re: Draft Article 2B of the Uniform Commercial Code
______________________________________________________________________
Dear Commissioner:
I am writing to you to express great concern about draft Article
2B of the Uniform Commercial Code. As you gather in Sacramento,
California for the annual meeting of the National Conference of
Commissioners on Uniform State Laws to discuss and debate the
various articles being considered, I encourage you to pay particular
attention to draft Article 2B. It overwhelmingly favors software
industry interests over consumers (attached are several opinion
and news articles highlighting specific problems in the draft
law), and I urge you to send a strong message conveying dissatisfaction
with the draft to the Article 2B drafting committee.
Despite heavy criticism from consumer advocates, the library community,
law professors, as well as members of NCCUSL and the American
Law Institute (ALI), the overall biases of Article 2B have remained
unchanged. At its last annual meeting, NCCUSL told the Article
2B drafting committee to go back to the drawing board and formulate
a balanced draft because software vendors were given too many
benefits and software purchasers too few protections. Here we
are a year later. Not much has changed substantively - Article
2B has had a few sections modified for the better, but other areas
have been changed for the worse - yet the draft law is getting
closer and closer to completion. It seems that the drafters'
strategy is to resist making significant modifications in an effort
to simply outlast those that criticize the draft.
At ALI's annual meeting in May, Article 2B was once again subject
to serious criticism and a motion offered by Professor Charles
McManis addressing copyright issues was approved. ALI members
also promised that major substantive motions would be made on
the floor of the conference at next year's annual meeting if the
draft is not improved to protect consumers. But again, despite
repeated admonitions from ALI members and other interested parties,
the latest draft of Article 2B continues to favor industry at
the expense of consumers and the public interest.
The many software industry participants, far outnumbering consumer
advocates, have lobbied long and hard in order to get Article
2B in its current formulation. In addition, industry lobbyists,
such as the Software Publishers Association and the Business Software
Alliance, have used hardball tactics to bully the drafting committee,
for example, by threatening to walk away from the drafting process
and use the financial and political power of their thousands of
members to oppose enactment of Article 2B unless disputes on specific
sections were resolved in their favor. This kind of heavy-handed
lobbying has contributed to an unbalanced draft and it puts the
drafting committee in the unenviable position of attempting to
correct 2B's leanings in favor of the software industry at the
risk of imperiling the entire undertaking.
It is apparent, both from the content of the draft law and 2B's
history of resisting any fundamental change, that drastic action
is needed to correct its imbalances. Perhaps the only way the
drafting committee will have the ability to overcome the industry's
intransigence and unwillingness to compromise is through a showing
by the commissioners of their disapproval of the draft law. It
is time to send a strong signal that the overall balance of 2B
must finally change, or the Article 2B drafting committee must
be dissolved and the project abandoned.
Sincerely,
/s/ Ralph Nader
Attachments