Inside US Trade
December 6, 2002
U.S. Trade Representative Robert Zoellick came under pressure last
week from members of the Senate not to settle for a deal in the World Trade
Organization that allows developing countries to import generic copies
of patented drugs to treat a wide range of diseases.
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus and committee members
Orrin Hatch (R-UT), John Breaux (D-LA) and Bob Graham (D-FL) wrote Zoellick
Nov. 25 urging that he negotiate a deal specifically limited to HIV/AIDS,
tuberculosis, malaria and "infectious epidemics of similar gravity and
scale that may arise in the future." That language is lifted verbatim from
an earlier letter to Zoellick from 20 pharmaceutical company executives
(Inside U.S. Trade, Nov. 22, p.11).
The senators' letter was in concert with a concentrated lobbying
campaign by the pharmaceutical industry aimed at ensuring that the U.S. does not
embrace an open-ended definition that would permit developing countries to
issue compulsory licences for the manufacture and importation of generic
drugs to combat a wide variety of health problems. One industry source said
that campaign included calls to the White House critical of the U.S.
negotiating stance.
Following that pressure, U.S. Ambassador to the WTO Linnet Deily last
week said that the U.S. wanted to find a mechanism definitively limited to
the three pandemics and others of similar gravity and scale (Inside U.S.
Trade, Nov. 29, p. 1). Her statements came despite earlier indications that
the U.S. was willing to agree to a compromise based on the Doha
declaration, which highlights the pandemics but also refers generally to the public
health problems facing developing countries.
"An open-ended or unclear exception to the standards for patent
protection would seriously undermine our interest and set back the long-term
public health objectives" agreed by trade ministers in Doha last year, the
senators' letter says.
At issue are efforts by countries to agree by the end of this year on
an exception to the WTO Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of
Intellectual Property Rights to allow countries with no pharmaceutical
manufacturing capacity to override patent rules to import generic copies of drugs
from abroad.
The senators wrote that they hope to work with Zoellick on an agreement
that
maintains the integrity of the TRIPS agreement and meets the year-end
deadline mandated in the Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health.
However, some trade officials believe that if the U.S. stands firm in
its
efforts to definitively limit the agreement to these three diseases
and
future pandemics, there is little chance of winning support from
developing
countries and reaching a deal by the end of the year. Developing
countries
have argued that the reference in paragraph one of the Doha Declaration
on
TRIPS and Health to the three pandemics affecting Africa should not be
taken
to limit the agreement to these three diseases or to epidemics.
After talks on the issue broke down last week, TRIPS Council Chairman
Eduardo Perez Motta called a cooling off period, urging delegations to
consult with their capitals. Talks will resume at an open-ended
informal
meeting Sunday, Dec. 8, with the goal of agreeing in time to report to
the
Dec. 10-11 General Council. But those talks could potentially continue
up to
the year-end deadline.
At a Nov. 28 formal meeting of the TRIPS Council, the African group
expressed disappointment and frustration with how talks have
progressed.
"The group feels that if discussions continue on the same line as they
have
been conducted to date, then it is unlikely that the desired solution
will
be forthcoming, particularly one meant to address the public health
problems
afflicting Africa," the African group statement said. The African group
has
argued that the scope of a solution should be based on the goal in the
Doha
TRIPS declaration to promote "access to medicines for all."
Although some Geneva officials held out hope that the hard line taken
by the
U.S. was merely a negotiating tactic from which the U.S. would
eventually
back down, U.S. industry sources say they have been assured that this
was
the U.S. bottom line. At the same time, U.S. officials remain committed
to
reaching agreement by the end of the year, arguing the situation will
be
worse if the highly charged political issue is bumped to the Cancun
ministerial in September.
One source said that industry remains wary that Zoellick's battlefield
conversion to the industry viewpoint will not stick. "We applied
unbelievable pressure," the industry source said. "But you always have
to be
worried about new converts. . . How long will the convert stay
converted?"
In addition to the White House calls, and letters from CEOs and
Congress to
Administration officials, in addition to a Wall Street Journal
editorial
that accused Zoellick of showing weakness on drug patent issues in the
negotiations, the source said.
The Nov. 25 letter from senators reminds Zoellick that his fast-track
negotiating authority "instructs USTR to seek agreements that respect
the
exceptional circumstances outlined in the Doha Declaration." However,
the
language referred to, an amendment sponsored by Sen. Edward Kennedy
(D-MA),
makes no reference to exceptional circumstances. It simply calls on
USTR to
respect the Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health in future trade
agreements, and was designed to prevent the U.S. from undermining the
flexibility on TRIPS rules affirmed in that declaration in future
bilateral
or regional accords.
Return to: CPTech Home -> Main IP Page -> CPTech Page on WTO -> Paragraph 6 Page |