December 13, 2002
The Honorable Robert B. Zoellick
Dear Ambassador Zoellick,
On behalf of Consumers Union, the nonprofit publisher of Consumer
Reports, I am most concerned about the untenable US negotiating
position in Geneva on access to medicines, as reported in the
media.
The reported direction of the current discussions on Paragraph 6
of the DOHA declaration on TRIPS and Public Health would
seriously narrow the policy approach stated in the current TRIPS
agreement. And, it would be completely out of keeping with the US
commitment in the DOHA Ministerial Declaration on the
availability of essential medicines to all people.
While negotiating details are difficult to come by, we are
concerned about, and are opposed to, the following likely results
of these discussions:
We urge that the US position in the Paragraph 6 negotiations give
developing countries the clear and unmistakable right to gain for
their populations access to the medicines that are needed to save
the lives of millions who are endangered by a wide variety of
conditions and diseases, as was intended by the original TRIPS
agreement and the DOHA Declaration.
Therefore, I urge you to support provisions in the Paragraph 6
negotiations that will fulfill the intent of the DOHA
Declaration, that will advance global public health, and will
reflect the concern the American people have always shown for the
lives and health of the poor and afflicted all over the world.
Sincerely,
Rhoda H. Karpatkin,
cc: Joseph Papovich, Assistant USTR
U.S. Trade Representative
600 - 17th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20508
Such an outcome would place the economic interests of the
pharmaceutical industry over the lives and health of millions of
people. This outcome is surely not reflective of the goals of the
development round that the US committed to in DOHA.
President Emeritus
Return to: CPTech Home -> Main IP Page -> CPTech Page on WTO -> Paragraph Six Page |