GROUP OF 77 & CHINA
GENEVA
22 October 2001
Declaration of the Group of 77 and China
on the Fourth WTO Ministerial Conference at Doha, Qatar
- The Group of 77 and China support the rules-based multilateral
trading system (MTS) as one of the essential instruments for the promotion
of economic development. the facilitation of developing countries'
integration into the Global economy and the eradication of poverty
worldwide. We recognise the critical importance of the rules-based
multilateral trading system and of transparent decision-making process in
the WTO managing globalisation and reducing the scope for unilateral
actions.
- Developing countries have a clear interest in strengthening
the system in a marine, that promotes their development. In many respects
multilateral rules need to be improved to become more responsive to the
trade and development interests of developing countries and to achieve
equitable objectives.
- Due to the systemic shortfalls in the international economic and
trading system a large majority of the developing countries have, so far,
failed to accrue a share in the global economic prosperity. Moreover. the
global economic slowdown/recession is going to affect all including most
seriously the developing countries and the poorest among them.
- In the above context, we note with great concern that the
benefits of the existing multilateral trading system continue to elude
developing countries. Progress towards full liberalization in sectors of
particular interest to them is lagging behind, and significant, imbalances
between rights and obligations exist in multilateral trade agreements
(MTAs), as well as in conditions of market access. In this regard, the
decreasing participation of developing countries in the world trade should
be urgently addressed. Addressing these asymmetries and the development
deficit should receive primacy in all future work programmes in WTO since
the key to sustained global economic growth lies in unlocking, the potential
growth of developing countries. The development dimension must be fully
incorporated into the MTS.
- We express deep disappointment on the lack of any meaningful
progress on implementation issues. Despite a clear consensual decision in
May and December 2000 by the WTO General Council to address and adopt
decisions no later than the 4th Ministerial Meeting. We note that the
developing countries have identified 104 implementation issues which emanate
from the inadequate or faulty implementation of agreements, in letter and
spirit; those arising from incorrect interpretation of the provisions of
those agreements: and those which arise from inherent asymmetries and
imbalances within the WTO agreements. We reiterate the need for full and
faithful implementation and the redressal of existing imbalances arising
from the Uruguay Round Agreement, which is an important step towards
confidence building and restoring the credibility of the multilateral
trading system and therefore must be meaningfully resolved, with urgency
before the 4th Ministerial Meeting and without any extraneous linkages.
- We note that the Uruguay Round Agreements have not resulted. as
promised. in greater market access to the developed countries' markets for
the exports of developing and least developed countries. The continued
existence in developed countries of tariff peaks, tariff escalations and
other non-tariff barriers such as arbitrary and complex rules of origin,
technical barriers to trade, and sanitary and phytosanitary measures used
for protectionist purposes. as well as abuse of the so called trade remedies
such as anti-dumping. countervailing duties and safeguard actions
particularly in sectors of interest for developing, countries including
textiles and clothing, agriculture and other agro-industrial products has
had a serious negative impact on the trade and development prospects of the
developing and least developed countries and has prevented these countries
from reaping the benefits of trade liberalization. The Ministerial Meeting
in Doha should address the negative impact of these measures on market
access opportunities for developing countries with a view to their
elimination.
- We believe that since the Special and Differential (S&D)
provisions in the existing UR agreements, are mostly in form and not in
substance. WTO Agreements should take into account the special development
needs of developing countries. including LDCs, in a more meaningful and
effective manner and call upon developed countries to urgently undertake
positive measures to respond to the development, financial and trade needs
of developing countries without reciprocal obligations. It also needs to
ensure their effective applicability in terms of the intended objectives, by
making those provisions more precise and effective. These provisions need
to be legally binding and must be operationalised and made enforceable so
that these do not remain merely "best endeavour clauses." The members should
agree to conclude a Framework Agreement on the S&D Provisions.
- The on-going mandated negotiations in the areas of Agriculture
and Services as well as mandated reviews need to result in improved market
access opportunities and more fair and equitable rules for developing
countries. We urge the Doha Ministerial Conference to redouble efforts in
this regard.
- Trade in agriculture has been thereto characterized by high
levels of protection through the use of high level of subsidies and a range
of tariff and non-tariff barriers in the developed countries. Deeply
concerned by the lack of progress on the on-going mandated negotiations
under article 20 of the AoA, we stress the need for the 4th Ministerial
Conference to take the necessary decisions for achieving the fundamental
reform of agriculture, leading to its' incorporation into the rules and
disciplines of the WTO, through:
- The adoption of effective modalities for eliminating the trade and
production-distorting measures as well as the trade impeding, impact of
such instruments on developing- countries exports in agriculture:
- Developed countries' undertaking to eliminate tariff peaks. tariff
escalations: to substantially reduce bound tariffs: to substantially. reduce
domestic support: and to eliminate all forms of export subsidies. An
improved differential and favourable treatment which is operational,
effective and binding, is critical to promote the development potential of
agriculture in the developing- countries:
- The redressal of the inequitable nature of existing provisions of
the Agreement on Agriculture. In this regard the proposal by developing
countries on "Development Box" should be included in the provisions of a
renewed and more equitable agreement as well as other proposals made by
developing countries and S&D and the concerns of single commodity producers
and SIDS. Proposals made by developing countries on non-trade
concerns-namely food security and rural development shall also be addressed.
As agreed, the appropriate mechanisms should be established to ensure the
implementation of the commitments made in the Decision on Measures in favour
of Net Food importing Developing- Countries and LDCS.
- Trade preferences remain crucial in increasing developing
countries shares in international trade and they should be meaningful and
not tied to non-trade conditionalities.
- We note with deep concern the substantial lag in the
participation of developing countries in the trade in services. The ongoing
mandated negotiations on trade in services shall be conducted on the basis
of progressive liberalization as a means to promote the economic growth of
all trading partners and the development of the developing countries. We,
therefore, re-affirm the importance of the Guidelines and Procedures for
Negotiations adopted by the Council for Trade and Services on 28th March
2001 (document S,/L/ 93), which shall form the basis for continuing the
negotiations with a view to achieving the objectives of the General
Agreement on Trade in Services. as stimulated in the Preamble, Article IV
and Article XIX of that Agreement.
- We consider that negotiations should make operational the
provisions under the TRIPs Agreement relating to the transfer of technology,
to the mutual advantage of producers and users of technological knowledge,
and seek mechanisms that allow for the disclosure of the sources of
traditional knowledge and (genetic resources used in inventions, in order to
achieve a fair and equitable sharing of benefits. In this regard. the TRIPs
agreement should be supportive of and not run counter to the objectives and
principles of the CBD with view to ensuring the protection of biological
resources and to promote disciplines to protect traditional knowledge and
genetic resources. The TRIPS review shall fully take into account the
developmental dimension and during the course of this review members should
agree not to invoke dispute settlement procedures against the developing
countries.
- We affirm that nothing in the TRIPS agreement should prevent governments
from taking measures for protecting public health and nutrition as well as
from ensuring affordable access to essential medicines and life saving drugs
in keeping with public health concerns of developing countries.
- We underline the importance of the review of the Agreement on
Trade Related Investment Measures and reiterate that appropriate amendments
in the TRIPS Agreement are necessary for developing countries to enable them
to pursue their goals for development and rapid industrialization including
indigenisation. We also stress that there should be a positive approach to
requests for further extension of the transition period for developing
countries under the TRIPS Agreement and in accordance to the 8 May 2000
Decision by the General Council. We further affirm that there should not be
any expansion in the list of the measures covered by the disciplines of the
TRIPS Agreement and during the course of the review members should agree not
to invoke dispute settlement procedures against the developing countries.
- There is an immediate need for a meaningful integration of
the textile and clothing sector, in view of very limited liberalization of
trade, affecting items under specific quota restraints and meaningful
increase in access possibilities for small suppliers from developing
countries. Measures in this regard should include, inter alia, accelerated
liberalization through removal of restrictions in accordance with the ATC
and application of moratarium on antidumping, anti-subsidy and safeguard
measures resorted to by industrialized countries.
- Measures to address implementation and mandated negotiations
including the review of various WTO agreements already constitute a broad
agenda for work. We recognize that issues such as trade and investment.
competition, transparency in government procurement. trade facilitation, are
important. However, any decision to conduct negotiations on these issues in
WTO should be on a consensual basis and would need to be carefully assessed
in respect of any implication on developing countries and their capacity to
engage in negotiations. Furthermore, proposals of the developing countries
to redress the development deficit in WTO must constitute first priority for
any additional negotiations.
- We note that developing countries have highlighted some issues
like trade and debt. trade and finance and trade and transfer of technology
in the preparatory process for Doha and earlier Seattle. The establishment
of mechanisms to meaningfully address these issues, which are of utmost
concern to developing countries. should be urgently considered.
- We consider that developing countries continue to be constrained
among others by limited technical and institutional capacities to fully
adapt their national laws and fulfill their obligations as required and take
full advantage of the provisions of the multilateral trade agreements. We
urge developed country members of the WTO to fulfill their obligations and
undertakings with regard to capacity building, and other technical
assistance support to developing and least developed countries in letter and
spirit. There is a need to enhance and ensure the provision of necessary
resources on a predictable and regular basis and that technical cooperation
activities should be funded from the regular budget of the WTO. We call for
strengtheng technical assistance and capacity building activities of WTO.
The international agencies of United Nations and other relevant
organizations. Technical assistance should not be subject to
conditionalities.
- We stress the importance for all countries of consistency between
national trade policies and the multilateral trade agreements. In this
regard. we reiterate our concern and call or the elimination of the
continuing use of coercive economic measures against developing countries,
through, inter alia, unilateral economic and trade sanctions which are in
contradiction with international law, in particular new attempts aimed at
extraterritorial application of domestic law. which constitute a violation
of the United Nations Charter and of WTO rules.
- There is an urgent need to implement the commitments undertaken in
the Plan of Action adopted at the Third United Nations Conference on the
Least Developed Countries (LDC III) in particular Commitment 5. "Enhancing
the Role of Trade in Development" and Commitment 7 Mobilizing Financial
Resources". There should be a binding commitment to grant LDCs duty free
and quota free access by the developed countries for their exports.
- The developed countries should also give due regard to the
interest of other developing countries for future improved market access
commitments.
- The Integrated framework (IF) remains a viable mandate for
delivering co-ordinated trade and trade-related technical assistance to
LDCs. The IF trust fund requires adequate funding and greater transparency
in its implementation, including the basis for selecting beneficiary
countries.
- In view of the increasing marginalization of Least
Developed Countries (LDCs) in world trade, we urge the Ministerial
Conference of WTO to take into account the spirit and recommendations of the
Declaration of the recently LDCs Trade Ministers Meeting held in Zanzibar,
to enhance their participation in the multilateral trading system.
- LDC applicants for WTO membership should allowed to accede
on a fast track on the basis of flexible agreed criteria and obligations
commensurate with their stage of development and based on the S&D treatment
in favour of LDCs. The commitments of acceding LDCs should not exceed those
of LDCs currently Members of WTO.
- We reaffirm that ILO is the competent body to set and deal with
all issues relating to labour standards. We therefore firmly oppose any
linkage between trade and labour standards. We are also against the use of
environmental standards as a new form of protectionism. We believe that
issues relating to such standards should be dealt with by the competent
international organizations and not by the WTO.
- Developing concepts such as global coherence with other
intergovernmental organizations like ILO and UNEP should be cautioned
against as it may be used to link trade with social and environmental issues
for protectionist purposes.
- We stress the need to address the specific problems of small
economies, which are being increasingly marginalized in the multilateral
trading system. Therefore, the ministerial decision should reflect the need
to address the specific problems faced by small economies and to agree on a
relevant work program for them.
- We also take note of the problems of the land-locked developing
countries and SIDS emanating from the constraints due to their geographical
location. Ways to address these problems should be identified.
- We recognize that regional and sub-regional integration amongst
developing countries is essential to reversing the process of
marginalisation and constitute a dynamic building block for their effective
participation into the multilateral trading system. However, we are
concerned with RTAS, involving developed countries. which discriminate
against many developing and the least developed countries. We, therefore,
call for the elimination of tariff differentials that discriminate against
developing countries in RTAs amongst the developed countries.
- We take note of current work on enhancing coherence and
complementary amongst the Bretton Woods institutions and the WTO, whose
policies and obligations should be mutually supportive in promoting the
development objective of the MTS. especially those of developing countries,
with a view to ensuring policy consistency. improved co-ordination on
technical and financial assistance, improving foreign direct investment
(FDI) flows. reduction of the debt burden and eradicating poverty. To this
end, the imposition of cross conditionalities or additional conditions on
Governments shall be avoided.
- The universality of the World Trade Organization should be
achieved as soon as possible in order to strengthen the multilateral trading
system. We strongly believe that appropriate assistance should be made
available to developing countries seeking accession. They should be offered
terms that do neither exceed nor are unrelated to the commitments of
developing country and LDC members of WTO. We urge that all WTO members
refrain from placing excessive or onerous demands on applications from
developing countries. Therefore, there is a need for a transparent,
streamlined and accelerated accession process that is in keeping with WTO
rules and discipline.
- We recognize the very extensive market access and other
commitments made by the newly acceding developing countries. This should be
taken into account in future trade negotiations.
- We call upon the need of continuing the work program on
e-commerce. We also reaffirm the need to bridge the digital divide and
eliminate all restrictions to the participation of developing countries and
to access to modern technologies.
- The clarification of the applicable WTO rules to electronic
Commerce will be of interest to all Members. Future work in this context
should aim to create new opportunities for the expansion of trade, and in
particular, for greater participation in international trade on the part of
developing countries and for their small and medium enterprises.
- We reiterate the need to urgently reach a decision in WTO with
regard to the request for permanent observers status that have been
submitted by regional and other intergovernmental organizations from
developing countries.
CPT Home
IP and Healthcare
CPT Page on Doha Ministerial