James Love
version 0.1a ------------- uncorrected draft -------
Essential Health Research and the Market
In matters concerning public health, intellectual property rights are a means and not an end. Patents and other types of intellectual property rights are mechanisms to promote research. They are not the only mechanisms to promote research. Public spending on research and mandatory reinvestment requirements are other mechanisms, for example.
There are many possible areas for medical research. The priority given various research projects will depend upon the framework. For example, in a market driven system with strong forms of intellectual property rights for invention, one would expect investments targeted at projects with the greatest rate of return. This might include projects that are important from a public health point of view, such as the development of products or marketable technologies that treat important public health problems. But it will also include other projects, that are less essential.
Market incentives will also drive investments into areas that have some value to society, but which would not be considered the highest priority from a public health perspective. For example, considerable private investments are spent on baldness remedies or "me too" drugs that do not represent important advances in therapeutic value.
To better appreciate the limits of market incentives, it is useful to think about some of the areas where market incentives are insufficient. Here are just a few:
A program for Essential Health Research
The World Health Organization has a very important program on Essential Drugs. This program focuses on the rational use of pharmacueticals, given limited resources. The WHO essential drugs program, and the many variations of this program by national governments, public health organizations, or even private sector health maintenance organiations, typically address the issue of how an existing body of medical technology can be used. The emphasis is on access, and proper use of drugs.
A program on essential medical research would address a different set of
issues. Clearly one would want to identify areas of research that are
essential, and to discuss the setting of priorities. But for this to be
meaningful, there should also be an identification of the mechansims and means
to pay for the research program.
As indicated above, three important mechanisms for funding medical research
are:
The approaches in 1-3 can also be combined in any number of ways.
Implications of the Essential Health Research approach
A program that seeks to promote an Essential Health Research (EHR) agenda
would have several important implications. These come to mind.
These are some preliminary thoughts on the development of a program for
essential health research. We welcome your thoughts. Please send comments to
James Love love@cptech.org