astrocartography.com NAF case	Domain name retained on the grounds that it was a generic name despite existence of a trademark.
bodacious-tatas.com WIPO Case	Domain name transferred to Tata Group India, multi billion dollar industrial company "deserve[s] wide protection" due to its "aura of high repute".
bridgestone-firestone.net	The respondent published a website critical of Bridgestone-Firestone. The WIPO upheld the right to critize Bridgestone-Firestone at a domain name comtaining the company's trademark, citing free speech interests.
catmachines.com WIPO Case	Domain name transferred to complaintant, Caterpillar industrial machinery manufacturer, who maintained that the domain name was confusingly similar to their trademark. Interestingly, the panel did not note that the domain "catmachine.com" is now in use by a firm that dsigns web pages.
csa-canada.com csa-international.net	A firm critical of the Canadian Standards Association, owner of csa-international.com and trademark holder of CSA, for failing to certify one of its products published its views on a website at csa-canada.com and csa-international.net. The WIPO transferred the domain to the complaintant, explicitly rejecting the free speech defense invoked successfully in bridgestone-firestone.net.
crew.com WIPO case	Domain name transferred to J. Crew from a domain name speculator. One WIPO panelist voiced strong dissent from the majority over the use of UDRP to protect generic trademarks.
dodgevipers.com	A fan of the automobile Dodge Viper published a website at this domain, the WIPO ruled that this was not a legitimate use.
ereuters.com WIPO Case	Domain name retained because of inability to find bad faith on part of the respondent.
esquire.com NAF Case	Domain name transferred to Hearst Magazines, publisher of Esquire, the US men's magazine, despite respondent's apparently legitimate interest in developing a vanity email service using the domain name.
eurotrash.com WIPO Case	In contrast to the esquire.com ruling, the respondent in the eurotrash.com case retained the domain name because of "legitimate interest".
kwasizabantu.[com,org,net]	The respondent published a website critical of the KwaSizabantu religious sect. The WIPO transferred the domain names citing "such activity amounts to tarnishing the activities associated with the trademark or service mark 'KwaSizabantu'".
penguin.org WIPO Case	Domain named retained by respondent nicknamed "the Penguin". Complaintant was Penguin Books.
pueblo.org NAF Case	The complaintant, a large supermarket chain, sought the transfer of the domain name from the city of Pueblo, Colorado. The panel rejected the transfer, maintaining that the .org suffix distinguished the domain name from the trademarked name.
peta.org	The animal rights group People for the Ethical Treatement of Animals, owners of the trademark PETA, brought a complaint under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act" against the holder of the domain name who published a parody site "People Eating Tasty Animals". The US federal court transferred the domain name.
scientologie.org	The Church of Scientology sought the transfer of the domain name for a website of a splinter Scientology group that was critical of it. The WIPO denied the request to transfer citing legitimate interest on the part of the respondent.
shack.com NAF case	Domain name retained by respondent nicknamed "Shack". Complaintant was Radio Shack.
tonsil.com WIPO case	Domain name transferred to a German chemical products firm claiming a trademark on tonsil, and that the word tonsil is "an invented word that has no meaning or significance other than to identify and distinguish its products from those of its competitors."
walmartcanadasucks.com	The WIPO transferred ownership of walmartcanadasucks.com (as well as a number of other such domain names containing "walmart") to Walmart from a domain name speculator.