version 1.1
love@cptech.org
Comment on this message: "Meeks, Brock" wrote: > > But Steve Case, just now on the conference call, said that he knew the cable > open access issue would be a potential hurdle, so "we took it off the table > right away" but saying that the new company would be in FAVOR of open access > cable and provide for customer choice for ISPs. > When AOL purchaed Netscape, the company said it would continue to support the Mozilla project. We asked AOL to make specific legally binding commitments to this effect, and AOL refused. Since then, there have been some notable departures from the Mozilla project staff. Here is a link to Steve Case's letter to Jamie Zawinski when the Netscape merger was announced. http://www.mozilla.org/stevecase.html "Hopefully by now the AOL positon on mozilla.org is clear to all, but I did want to let you know personally that we're very supportive of mozilla.org;" When the merger was pending, Jamie Zawinski was quite hopeful. But later he resigned. http://www.jwz.org/gruntle/nomo.html In general, we expect AOL to flip an issues when it suits AOL -- just as it did when it dropped Netscape as its browser in return for Microsoft giving AOL a good position for its ICON on Windows. Jamie -- James Love http://www.cptech.org mailto:love@cptech.org voice 1.202.387.8030 Other people who know about this include:Andy Schwartzman, Media Access Project Jeff Chester, Media Access Project Gene Kimmelman, Consumers Union Mark Cooper, CFA